<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recent Court Ruling Could Impact Search Strategies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://451heat.com/2010/02/12/recent-court-ruling-could-impact-search-strategies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://451heat.com/2010/02/12/recent-court-ruling-could-impact-search-strategies/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:53:26 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://451heat.com/2010/02/12/recent-court-ruling-could-impact-search-strategies/comment-page-1/#comment-8926</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://451heat.com/?p=1068#comment-8926</guid>
		<description>That last worst was supposed to be &quot;dégoût.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That last worst was supposed to be &#8220;dégoût.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://451heat.com/2010/02/12/recent-court-ruling-could-impact-search-strategies/comment-page-1/#comment-8925</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://451heat.com/?p=1068#comment-8925</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know. I am with the courts on this one. eBay is buying someone&#039;s brand name (even if it is misspelled). This reeks of typosquatting. eBay is trying to take advantage of consumers and confuse them to sell products on their site. I think this is especially key since eBay would probably defend itself saying that it isn&#039;t responsible for the sale of fake Vuitton bags, it is the users. eBay shouldn&#039;t facilitate it either.

That being said, the damages were probably enhanced because Vuitton is a French company in a French court.

Lastly, I would end my comment by saying, &quot;The French.&quot;  Shakes head in &lt;&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know. I am with the courts on this one. eBay is buying someone&#8217;s brand name (even if it is misspelled). This reeks of typosquatting. eBay is trying to take advantage of consumers and confuse them to sell products on their site. I think this is especially key since eBay would probably defend itself saying that it isn&#8217;t responsible for the sale of fake Vuitton bags, it is the users. eBay shouldn&#8217;t facilitate it either.</p>
<p>That being said, the damages were probably enhanced because Vuitton is a French company in a French court.</p>
<p>Lastly, I would end my comment by saying, &#8220;The French.&#8221;  Shakes head in &lt;&gt;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @conroydave</title>
		<link>http://451heat.com/2010/02/12/recent-court-ruling-could-impact-search-strategies/comment-page-1/#comment-8159</link>
		<dc:creator>@conroydave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://451heat.com/?p=1068#comment-8159</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with google on this one (surprise)
This ruling is absurd. Just because you control the naming rights to a product, I don&#039;t think that it should give you control of where people can buy it and for how much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with google on this one (surprise)<br />
This ruling is absurd. Just because you control the naming rights to a product, I don&#8217;t think that it should give you control of where people can buy it and for how much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
